How Does AI Split Stems? A Deep Dive Into the Tech

A practical, technical walkthrough of how AI stem separation works, what challenges models face, and how different platforms compare. Producers will learn what actually happens under the hood and why our multi-step approach delivers cleaner, more reliable stems for real-world music workflows.

Dec 12, 2025
notion image
Most producers start with a limitation nobody really likes to admit: you rarely get multitracks. You get a single stereo file, a master that has already been compressed, limited, glued together, and mixed until everything sits exactly where it should for listening. That is great for the audience. It is a headache when you want to remix, sample, analyze, or rebuild a track from the inside out.
So producers need to know: how does AI actually split stems? What is happening inside these systems? Why do some tools leave you with watery artifacts while others keep things clean? And why do some splitters work for basic vocals and drums but fall apart when you push them harder?
The short answer is this: stem separation is not a single action. It is a chain of decisions made by a model that is trying to understand a fully mixed track. That is a lot more complex than “remove vocals.”
The longer answer is what we are going to walk through. By the end, you will know what is happening technically, why stem extraction is hard, and how different platforms approach it.

What Actually Happens When You Upload a Track

When you upload a song, the system does not immediately start ripping vocals out of the mix. There is a full chain of audio operations happening under the hood, especially in premium and standard modes, and those early steps matter more than most people realize.

1. Preprocessing: Cleaning Before Cutting

Premium and standard mode run your audio through a series of cleanup steps that dramatically improve separation quality:
  • De-noise removes low level hiss and hum that can confuse the model.
  • De-echo reduces room reflections that smear transients.
  • De-reverb strips out excess ambience so the underlying dry signal is clearer and easier to separate.
Producers get this instinctively. If your source is muddy, everything you do after it stays muddy. Preprocessing makes sure the model is not mistaking reverb tails for pads, early reflections for rhythmic info, or room noise for breathiness in a vocal.

2. Eco Mode: Fast or Cost-Efficient Splitting

Eco mode skips that preprocessing chain and goes straight to the requested stems. It is built for speed, quick iteration, early drafts, and cheaper processing.
The trade-off is simple: fewer enhancement steps mean you may hear slightly more artifacts, but the turnaround is much faster.

3. Determining the Separation Path (Pipeline Planning)

Once the file is prepped, the stem splitting engine decides how to pull it apart.
This is the part most users never think about. The system does not run one giant “remove everything at once” operation. It builds a chain of actions based on what you asked for.
If you request bass and drums, for example, the sequence might look like:
  1. Remove vocals
  1. Extract instrumentals
  1. Detect drum components
  1. Separate drum stem
  1. Separate bass stem
  1. Refine each output
The order here matters. Separation quality depends heavily on which decisions happen first. A tool that tries to split everything in one shot will usually leave you with ringing, phasing, or smeared harmonics.

4. Layered Dissection: The Actual Splitting

Inside the splitting stage, the model works stem by stem, following that planned chain. Even if all you want is a guitar track, the engine still:
  1. Cleans the signal
  1. Removes vocals
  1. Identifies percussive versus harmonic content
  1. Separates instrument families
  1. Isolates the target stem
Producers live by a simple rule: clean decisions early on save you from problems later.
notion image

How AI Detects Vocals, Drums, Bass, and Instruments

There is a common idea that AI stem separation is basically just EQing out certain frequency ranges. If that were true, every popular splitter would sound more or less the same. They do not. The differences come from how each engine recognizes what is inside a fully mixed track.

1. The Frequency Overlap Problem

This is where things get tricky:
  • Vocals and guitars both sit heavily in the 2 to 4 kHz range.
  • Kicks and basslines share the 50 to 120 Hz region.
  • Cymbals spill across most of the upper spectrum.
  • Reverb smears harmonic content into the spaces between everything else.
That is why older models, and some current ones, create swirling or watery artifacts. They lean too hard on simple frequency bias instead of understanding patterns.

2. Pattern Recognition, Not Just Filtering

Modern AI stem separation works by learning acoustic signatures, not just fixed EQ curves.
  • Vocals have consistent formants, vibrato behavior, and transient envelopes.
  • Drums have sharp attacks and characteristic decay shapes.
  • Bass behaves differently from guitars, with smoother low-end roll off and more stable energy.
  • Pads and leads occupy time and space differently from plucked or percussive sounds.

3. Why the Multi-Step Chain Matters

The order of operations makes the job easier:
  • Removing vocals first gives the model a cleaner canvas for drums.
  • Extracting drums before guitars prevents transient bleed into harmonic material.
  • Clearing broad harmonic content before isolating bass reduces mud and low-end conflict.
Every step cleans up the input for the next one.

Why Stem Splitting Is Technically Difficult

Even with a meticulous chain, very compressed or extremely reverb-heavy mixes will always be harder to separate without some artifacts. Some tracks will always retain a small amount of artifacting, even with the best settings, simply because the information in the mix is too heavily blended.
Here are a few reasons why stem splitting is technically difficult.

Energy Masking

Loud sounds hide quieter ones. If a guitar is roaring at full tilt, the low harmonics of a vocal can disappear underneath it. The AI then has to reconstruct details that are barely there or entirely buried.

Stacked Harmonies

When multiple vocals are tightly layered, older models have trouble deciding whether they belong together or should be separated. When they guess wrong, you get robotic artifacts and strange modulation.

Live Recordings

Bleed, inconsistent mic distance, and room reverb all work against clean separation. The model is not only dealing with the band, but also with the room the band is in.

Comparing Spleeter, Moises, LALAL.ai, and Suno to Lalals

Most stem splitters look similar on paper. You really feel the difference when you drop their stems into a DAW.
Spleeter is fast and free, which is why it spread so quickly. It runs on older, lightweight models, so it can pull basic vocals and instrumentals, but it often struggles with guitars, cymbals, and dense mixes. You hear that as ringing and a thin digital haze.
Moises is generally cleaner than Spleeter, especially for simple instrumentals. The trade-off is that its broad separation passes can introduce a phasey, slightly “chorus-like” tone on vocals and make single elements like bass or snare harder to trust.
LALAL.ai is strong for vocals. Acapellas can sound very clear. It offers fewer stem types and tends to have a harder time with transient heavy material, so drum stems can feel brittle or over-processed.
Suno Splitter is built for convenience inside the Suno platform. It is great for quick ideas and content, but it is not really aimed at precision, mix ready stems.
Lalals takes a different route. Preprocessing, multi-step dissection, and flexible eco or premium modes give you cleaner stems, less bleed, stronger transients, and outputs that feel ready to mix instead of files you need to repair.
Lalals also supports a broader range of stem types than many competitors, so you can go beyond the usual vocal and instrumental split.

Real Producer Workflows (Mini Case Studies)

So what does this look like in real life when people use stem splitters day to day?

1. Acapella Extraction for Remixes

You upload a track, split out the vocals, and the breath noise and consonants stay intact instead of turning metallic or fizzy. Your remix feels intentional, not like it is fighting against a broken vocal file.

2. Snare Extraction for Resampling

A producer isolates a snare, throws it into a sampler, and builds a new kit around it. On some tools, that snare would be smeared with leftover ambience or weird tails. A proper stem splitter keeps the attack curve and punch intact.

Why Lalals’ Approach Feels Different

Once you understand what the engine is actually doing, the quality difference makes sense. The system cleans the audio, plans the separation path, and splits stems in a sequence that makes technical sense. You feel that in practical ways:
  • You spend less time fixing artifacts.
  • You use fewer surgical EQ cuts to remove strange resonances.
  • Drum transients stay punchy without turning metallic.
  • Guitar and synth harmonics do not get chopped off.
  • Vocal breaths and tails stay natural instead of warbling.
The splitter stops being a problem you have to correct and turns into a tool you can lean on.

Hear the Difference for Yourself. Try Lalals’ Stem Splitter Today

If you have ever wondered how AI splits stems, the key idea is this: not all splitters work the same way, and depth of processing matters. It is not magic, and it is not “one click, perfect stems.” It is a full engine making smart decisions at every stage.
Lalals is built around precision, clarity, and producer-ready output. The stems do not just sound cleaner. They give you more creative freedom with less cleanup. Try the Lalals stem splitter on a track you already know and hear the difference for yourself.